Why magnetic monopoles don exist

We cannot find amagnetic field line which comes near or comes out from both side front and back. Hence poles are nothing but thedirection of magnetic field lines and we can not devide it So we can not find or can not creat monopoles. Pallavi Kumari. Mamata Awasthi. Jyoti Bhatia. View 18 more Answers. Urmila is a passionate teacher with over 8 years of experience in teaching. She is currently pursuing her Ph. Urmila began her career in teaching long before she became a teacher.

She used to provide classes for foreign national students in her college Meet Sandhya R, a B. Sc tutor from Bangalore. Sandhya is a proactive educationalist. Having a 6-year experience in teaching, she connects with her students and provides tutoring as per their understanding.

She mentors her students personally and strives them to achieve their goals with ease. Being an enthusiastic Meet Mohammad Wazid, a skilled trainer for Mohammad Wazid is a certified professional tutor for class 11 students. He has 6 years of teaching experience which he couples with an energetic attitude and a vision of making any subject easy for the students. Over the years he has developed skills with a capability of understanding the requirements of the students.

Meet Swati, a Hindi Tutor from Bangalore. Swati is a renowned Hindi tutor with 7 years of experience in teaching. She conducts classes for various students ranging from class 6- class 12 and also BA students. Having pursued her education at Madras University where she did her Masters in Hindi, Swati knows her way around students. She believes that each student I am a Student. I am a Tutor. Sorry, this phone number is not verified, Please login with your email Id. By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Over 55 lakh students rely on UrbanPro. Using UrbanPro. More than 7. Whether you are looking for a tutor to learn mathematics, a German language trainer to brush up your German language skills or an institute to upgrade your IT skills, we have got the best selection of Tutors and Training Institutes for you.

Read more. Post your Learning Need Signup as a Tutor. Why magnetic mono-pole does not exist? The main But both electricity and magnetism are entirely different: In electricity, you can have the positive and the negative charges configured together or can also exist individually like a proton or an electron. In magnetism as well, you can have the north and the south pole configured together, but not in isolation.

Hence, magnetic monopoles do not exist. Comments Dislike Bookmark. Magnetic mono-pole does not exists, because magnetic field lines always forms a closd loop. If it arises from one pole, then it has to terminate on other one, to form close loops, which is opposite pole, hence due to this property magnets always found in dipole.. Unpaired electrons contribute magnetic field to an atom.

Each electron revolving in its orbit acts as circular current One surface of loop acts north and other surface neccesarily be South Pole. Like that all atomic magnets have two poles when atomic magnets alline ,leave two poles to magnet so every Like that all atomic magnets have two poles when atomic magnets alline ,leave two poles to magnet so every magnet has two poles read less.

Ankit Physics Easy Magnetic field line always makes close loop. So there is no monopole existance in magnets. Now if we see the arrow from front then we realize that it comes near to us but when we see it from back from the tail Same thing happen with magnet poles. However many research are running on this topic in persent physics A magnet is an electric dipole so magnetic field lines are closed.

Thats why monopole cant exist. Magnetic fields are closedfields and net magnetic flux is always zero. Magnetic monopoles are hypothetical theoretical situations imagined to comparethe propreties of elecric and magnetic fields.

Just as in dark matter we don't have the instrumentation to measure this. A magnetic monopole does not exist. Just as the two faces of a current loop cannot be physically separated, magnetic North pole and the South pole can never be separated even on breaking a magnet to its atomic size.

A magnetic field is produced by an electric field and not by a monopole. If there are If there are charges, then magnetic field will be created due to their movements. Related Questions. Jan 3, — Received cash from Balan Rs.

Since all particles are emitting, the difference between anti-particles and particles cannot be a charge or electrical difference. The standard model knows the difference is not due to charge or the electrical field, but they continue to represent the difference with charge signs.

Since the particles are signed, they appear to carry a field polarity, but this appearance is deceiving. The standard model has assigned the difference or polarity to a quark difference, but this is just a mathematical model. There has never been any mechanical explanation for the opposite signs, or even an attempt at such an explanation. QCD doesn't pretend to be mechanical, and never did. Anti-particles not only have a reversed z-spin, they also have a charge field that is upside down.

That is, because their photons are emitted through the z-spin, the photons themselves have an opposite spin. The anti-particles are reversed, and their charge field is reversed as well, in a strictly mechanical way. This explains particle annihilation as well as parity violations and neutrino oscillation.

The opposite z-spins explain the first phenomenon, while the opposite charge fields explain the second and third. If a normal repulsive field exists between protons, I can dodge that field, appearing to be attracted.

Therefore our spins will cancel in collision, stripping us both of all charge as well as most of our energy. Since our charge fields are upside down, they have no spin exclusion, and cannot properly repel in all cases. Furthermore, our fields offset just like our spins, so that my charge field that of the anti-proton ends up annihilating an equal part of the proton charge field, causing an apparent parity loss.

Up to the present decade, the field is taught as a dipole field, signified with positive and negative signs, and with these potentials created by undefined charge. In other words, the charge is not and has never been defined mechanically.

The attraction and exclusion is represented by plusses and minuses and by nothing else. This heuristic, non-physical representation of forces has caused untold confusion, because potentials cannot be caused by themselves, or by charge signs. Potentials must be caused by mass or density differences: by real, assignable field parameters. QED and QCD just replaced the classical heuristics with more complex heuristics, but it has never once attempted to rigorously assign forces to physical causes or fields.

Once I did this, many of their intractable problems were immediately solved, since these problems were fake problems caused by the models themselves. You can only have a monopole if you have a dipole. You can only split something that is divisible. But if your field is just one emission field, always repulsive, you cannot split it.

A host of other problems of the standard model are of the same sort. I just sent a note to the Millennium editors, informing them that their Yang-Mills problem is of this sort. Jaffe and Witten, the sponsors of this particular problem, think that the Yang-Mills Theory requires more math to fully explain it.