Why does god attempt to kill moses

To refuse to perform the rite of circumcision was to cast doubt on the coming of Christ and the efficacy of the cross. That is, it was a repudiation of salvation through the shedding of the blood of Jesus as the washing away of sins. But Moses knew these things and he should have insisted. Baptism has taken the place of circumcision Col. Let us not take the importance of baptizing our children lightly. And let us not deny that baptism is a sacrament that takes the place of circumcision, now that Christ has come.

Classis East This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. This email address is being protected from spambots. Classis West This email address is being protected from spambots. Design by Social Village. Tuesday, 26 October CR News.

Rate this item 1 2 3 4 5 votes. Additional Info Volume: 13 Issue: Published in Covenant Reformed News. Hanko, Herman Prof.

Contact Details Address. But she was still upset over having to circumcise her son. There is more that is not recorded that took place, but is alluded to in Exodus Why had Moses sent his wife and his sons back? It is possible that because his son was most likely a young boy, not a baby or small child, circumcision would have made him unable to travel without great pain. The whole ordeal with his wife over the circumcision likely caused him to send his family back to his father-in-law's house.

After the drama of the circumcision Aaron, the brother of Moses, was commanded by God to meet him in the wilderness Exodus Zipporah almost certainly stayed at the Inn with her son until he was able to travel. This likely influenced the decision of Moses to send his family back to Jethro's house. Discerning the scriptures and how Zipporah was a woman who spoke her mind, and most likely not have let up on her husband all the while they were in Egypt, it made some sense from the point of view of Moses to send her back.

Zipporah took the foreskin of the circumcised boy and threw it at the feet of Moses along with mouthing her disgust for doing it!

She had successfully save her husband from being killed. God, however, no more mentions Zipporah after Exodus Additionally, her sons are not mentioned with any degree of importance anywhere else in the Bible. Ask a Question! It appears that God attempted to kill Moses this is the usual interpretation. God instructs Moses to fulfill a great mission to lead Israel out of Egypt and, just as he commences, God wants him dead. Then, just as quickly, God relents without explanation.

Just three verses. Then the narrative moves on with the Exodus story. The incongruity of this event demands that we investigate. In the Bible, we usually know why people are punished by God or at least there is a prophetic warning beforehand: Adam and Eve, Cain, the city of Nineveh.

In our story, it seems no reason is given. He stopped trying to kill him. The circumcision, it seems, appeased God. Jewish commentators Rashi and Sforno deduced from this that Moses had neglected to carry out the covenantal circumcision on his son.

God was angry with Moses to the point of wanting to kill him. Christian commentators generally have the same view. A nother problem: Are we sure God wanted to kill Moses? Perhaps He wanted to kill someone else. Many readers will be surprised to learn the Bible does not say God sought to kill Moses. The original Hebrew text does not name the person.

We know that four people started the journey: Moses, Zipporah and their two sons, Gershom and Eliezer. The only one we can exclude with certainty is Zipporah. In its preface, the editors admit they sometimes substitute pronouns with proper nouns or names for the sake of clarity. However well-intentioned, it takes considerable audac- ity to alter the text.

Moses, Gershom or Eliezer? While many think Moses, each one has been suggested by different commentators. Medieval commentator Ibn Ezra suggested Eliezer. By now some readers are asking: Does it even matter which one?